Camera Selection for Imaging

Optimizing camera choice for performance, precision, and integration in aerial mission

Selecting the Optimal Camera for Autonomous Aerial Imaging Missions

In the development of autonomous aerial systems, the choice of onboard imaging hardware is critical. Factors such as field of view (FOV), sensor resolution, weight, interface compatibility, shutter type, and system integration must be carefully evaluated to meet mission requirements like real-time processing, motion compensation, and data transmission.

Mission Requirements and Camera Selection Criteria

Our imaging system was designed to support a wide range of autonomous mission tasks including mapping,


1. Minimizing motion blur from aerial movement
2. Reducing overall payload weight for longer endurance
3. Achieving high-resolution imagery suitable for photogrammetry
4. Ensuring low-latency real-time data processing
5. Seamless integration with the flight controller for gimbal stabilization and synchronized triggering


These criteria guided our evaluation of several camera platforms.

ADTi Surveyour V3

ADTi Surveyour V3

Resolution: 6000×4000 (24MP)

Weight: 108g

Interface: Micro-USB

Shutter Type: Global Shutter

Pros: Lightweight, high resolution

Cons: Requires external gimbal

Sony Alpha 6000

Sony Alpha 6000

Sensor: 24.3 MP APS-C CMOS

Weight: ~344g

Shutter Type: Mechanical

Pros: Excellent image quality

Cons: Heavy, bulky, requires power-hungry gimbal

Arducam IMX477

Arducam USB

Pros: Lightweight, customizable

Cons: Rolling shutter artifacts

Poor synchronization at high speeds

Unsuitable for precision mapping

SIYI A8 MINI – Final Selection

Sensor: EO/IR with Global Shutter

Resolution: 4K

Interface: Ethernet (IP protocol)

Gimbal: Integrated 3-axis

Global shutter: Eliminates motion blur
Integrated gimbal: Reduces system weight and complexity
IP-based streaming: Low latency, real-time ground computation
Flight controller integration: GPS-triggered shutter, ROI tracking
Dual EO/IR capabilities for versatile missions
Drawback: Limited to 4K resolution (lower GSD)
component calculation

Why the SIYI A8 Mini Was Chosen

The SIYI A8 Mini offered the best trade-off between performance, integration, and weight. It fulfilled all major requirements:


1. Global Shutter: Crucial for accurate orthomosaic map generation and object recognition.
2. Lightweight Integrated Design: Avoids extra gimbal hardware while keeping video stable.
3. Ethernet Interface with IP Streaming: Enables low-latency transmission to ground and edge computing.
4. System Compatibility: Supports MAVLink for GPS sync and adaptive ROI tracking.


While 4K resolution slightly limits mapping accuracy compared to APS-C cameras, the benefits of integration, lower weight, and global shutter make it ideal for real-time object tracking and mapping.

component calculation

Conclusion

Camera selection for drone-based autonomous missions is not just about megapixels—it involves a careful balance of multiple parameters to meet specific operational constraints. In our system, the SIYI A8 Mini emerged as the optimal choice, delivering real-time, high-quality imagery with minimal system overhead. Its design aligns well with modern UAV requirements—especially in missions that demand autonomy, low latency, and high integration efficiency.